2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures bomb books budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal portland mayor president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties timber payments transportation union university of oregon violence washington water wildfire women

can you then only have healthy happy children  in a family with a mother and a father????

What about a dead spouse? What about an abusive partner? Our children need LOVING people...and that is it. The sex of the people providing care does not matter.

Maggie, no one seems to be buying your tugging on the heartstrings  "it is for the children" bit.

posted 2 years, 5 months ago
view in context

quick comment on  Maggie's  concern of change in marriage....I am sure that when wives were no longer were considered the property of their husbands some thought that marriage would be destroyed.

Change is not always bad

posted 2 years, 5 months ago
view in context