2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

It seems like there is so much ELF and others who share their views could do short of committing acts of violent property destruction. Violence, even when people are not harmed, undermines their message. To say they are justified by frustration is not persuasive when there is no publicity about the actions they have taken through legal and political channels to stop the practices they abhor. If they want to change the world they need to bring the public along with them, not turn the public off. Violence is only justified when it is the last resort, and from what I can see the ELF does not even attempt to make the case that it has exhaused legal and political avenues for change.

posted 5 years, 2 months ago
view in context