2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

My understanding is that top executives are eligible for unemployment benefits even after they've received a huge severance package.  It feels unfair that when our company essentially paid our previous executive director what amounted to 6 months pay in a lump sum that he/she was eligible for unemployment benefits right away.  So our company was then penalized with higher unemployment rates even though we paid out a package generous enough to allow time to find another job.  We also paid for an employment councelor for this individual.    P.S.  In reality this individual did find a another job within 6 months but also collected unemployment benefits during that time.

posted 4 years, 1 month ago
view in context