2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I am a 37 year old male from Portland. I moved here from Chicago 4 years ago because of the better access to wilderness.

I spend more time outside than my parents, although my parents spent substantial amount of time outdoors. Thanks to the influence of my father, I spend 150+ days a year watching birds -- usually between 3 and 8 hours per outing. My kids (7 and 9 year old boys) spend time outside, although not as much as me (yet). Our vacations usually involve camping and visits to National Parks.

As a parent, I make sure that they prefer being outdoors to being inside. Television and computers are a minimal part of their lives -- that is my job as a parent. They will not have cell phones anytime soon. Parents have more influence than they think, and don't have to let electronics take over the lives of their children.

I encourage my children to explore outside -- to look, touch, smell, taste. I give them free reign when I am in a location with no poisonous snakes. In rattlesnake country, I inform them of the dangers, keep a closer watch on them, but still give them freedom to explore.

I'm a big fan of state parks in theory, but tend not to visit them too often. I prefer National Wildlife Refuges and National Forests. Why? Because state parks often have loud gatherings of people and/or people with very little natural area etiquette, and this distracts from my experience. I usually avoid state parks on beautiful weekends, but visit them occasionally during less popular times.

My favorite state park, in my 4 years of living in Oregon, is Ft. Rock. Why? It is relatively undeveloped, and very few people who visit. Those who do tend to appreciate a natural experience, which is different, than say, a visit to Tryon Creek State Park or Ecola State Park. I suspect there are other wonderful state parks, I just haven't found them yet.

I'm saddened at the thought that state parks, or even NWRs, feel the need to build interactive exhibits to attract and entertain people. As if looking for bugs, snakes, turtles, frogs, birds, and whatever else awaits is not enough!

posted 5 years ago
view in context