2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures bomb books budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal portland mayor president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties timber payments transportation union university of oregon violence washington water wildfire women

I know there is always a gap between "programs" and
"implementatin", however, why is there not more emphasis on preventative care, including dental care, support for quiting smoking, improving diet and exercise as the foundation for a national care model regardless of who pays? 

Additionally, prices for all procedures need to be transparent, it is well nigh impossible to do any comparision "shopping" in the system as it now exists. As well, as easier ways for us to become more informed consumers.  I recently have found this difficult - as an uninsured 61 year old have tried to get prices for procedures in order to plan care.  One clinic wanted to charge me a $200 deposit and at least $100 at each visit there after, even if I paid in full with credit card and didn't have a list of fees. 

I believe most of us want to be more informed consumers and find th at process difficult. (I have medical care and billing background and still find it hard.)

posted 3 years, 2 months ago
view in context