2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

Having extensively covered the original debate in 2005 on Portland Communique

http://communique.portland.or.us/joint_terrorism_task_force/

I've had a number of thoughts about this sudden revisitation. Rather than rehash them here, I'll just link them.

First, a look at revisionist history when it comes to the JTTF debate:

http://furiousnads.com/posts/the-politics-of-revisionist-history-on-the-jttf

Second, a direct response to Anna Griffin's piece:

http://furiousnads.com/posts/having-it-both-ways-on-the-jttf

posted 2 years, 4 months ago
view in context