2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

As a veterinarian, I'm particularly intrigued by the level of confidence exhibited by pet owners with regard to the advice they "impose" on other pet owners they meet in public. More often than not the advice giver is poorly informed but has an (undeserved) confidence based on concern for the welfare of pets in general. As an example----all whippets appear to be starving, compared to most dogs and anyone thinking of acquiring one of this breed should be prepared to be accused of starving their dog when taking it for a walk.

I may not have a proper sampling, but have concluded that pet owners reserve the right to criticize/advise other pet owners about their pet's wellness. I can't imagine their having the same level of confidence to advice their friends and strangers about their personal health.

posted 4 years, 10 months ago
view in context